Stardoll VOGUE is a few slaves short of an empire created by Russian
But, just days after celebrating it's first birthday, a little bug by the name of Kirsten (sparklewand12) crawled out of the woodwork and exposed empress Christina in a way that shook us all. Kirsten composed a post on her blog which stated that Christina had refused to refund her payment after notifying her that she is quitting.
To my knowledge, Kirsten purchased a 12 month contract which granted her the privilege of being featured in at least 12 graphics (1 issue every month - 12 months = 12 issues = 12 features) but the shameful reality is that Kirsten appeared in only TWO graphics since purchasing her almost 1k Stardollars contract. She decided it wasn't worth the hassle; keeping to the contract meant she couldn't change her doll nor appear in graphics made by others, so she informed Christina that she was dropping out of the VOGUE Model House.
Kirsten requested that Christina give her a partial refund of 450SD considering she had only stuck on for 6 months - Christina rudely declined stating "it's not my fault". The real issue is that Kirsten is 100% entitled to a partial refund as she did NOT break any of the rules or specifications whilst on her contract, but Christina (being the greedy corporate queen she is) has her pockets sealed shut.
Should Christina give back the cash?
Is it rude of Kirsten to ask for a refund in the first place?
Are you #teamchristina or #teamkirsten?
Now now girls, let's have a clean fight (kidding, scratch each others eyes out!)
xoxo
1 comment:
Wow, she should definitely give a refund. This is what I hate about some people, they have no respect.
Post a Comment